The entirety of "Termrally models.do" can be run in one go to produce tables and figures featured in the manuscript.

The .do file features a note at the very top about the relevant Stata package and mode necessary to run the models. 

Preceding each model we have inserted cues for where each output features in the manuscript. For instance, the first four models labeled "Baseline Models" are all found in Table 2 in the manuscript as listed in the .do file. 
For tables with multiple models, each of these notes lists the relevant column and / or row. For example, the first interaction model ("Election Year Models") features in Table 3, column 1. The figure is found in Figure 2 on the top
left panel. And the model using the secondary dependent variable is found in table A2, column 1. Each of these columns has the correlating heading in the manuscript for intuitive matching.

The flow of the .do file is not linear throughout the manuscript. For example, when we run all interaction models, the first output are models featured in Table 3 with our primary dependent variable while the second output feeds into
Table A2 with our secondary dependent variable used as a robustness check. 

Here is the general flow of contents in the file:
1. baseline models (Table 2)
2. interaction models and figure (Table 3, Figure 2, Table A2)
3. robustness checks with 2SRI models (Tables A3 and A4)
4. Robustness checks with variations in the crisis sample (Tables A5 and A6)
>> For each of these, we clear all data, reload the dataset and specify preliminaries anew.
>> In Table A5, only the coefficients and standard errors for the primary independent variable "terminate" are reported.
>> In Table A6, only the coefficients and standards errors for the interaction terms are reported.
5. heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation tests and figures (Figure 1)
6. summary statistics (Table A1)

As a last note to replication analysts, we observed minute errors in the output for Tables A5 and A6, columns 3 and 4 (labeled "Related" robustness checks) due to one coauthor running models without the strategic rivalry control and 
one using it like all other models. We have corrected these in the LaTeX file for submission and are aware of the discrepancies. None of them alter or undermine substantive findings and are only nominally different. We apologize for
the mistakes.